AI Act — Regulation (EU) 2024/1689

What it is, what happened, who decided, what is being done, where to act. · updated 2026-09-03 · Ask about this act →

What it is

The world's first general law on artificial intelligence. It does not regulate the technology as such: it sorts AI uses by risk and applies different rules to each tier. A handful of uses are banned outright. "High-risk" systems are allowed but only with documentation, human oversight and a conformity assessment. For the rest the duty is transparency: a person must be told when they are talking to a machine or looking at generated content.

What happened

The fight is not about the bans. It is about what lands in the "high-risk" tier and what that costs. Ordinary things land there: sifting job applicants, grading students, scoring creditworthiness, running critical infrastructure. Each such system needs a risk-management system, technical documentation, logging, human oversight and a conformity assessment before it may be placed on the market. The obligations phase in until 2031 — and the act had already been simplified before most of them applied.

119
articles
8
languages
18
preparatory documents

What shows it

What is banned outright (Article 5). The act lists eight uses. Among them: "subliminal" or purposefully manipulative techniques that materially distort behaviour and cause significant harm; systems exploiting a person's vulnerabilities "due to their age, disability or a specific social or economic situation"; social scoring that leads to "detrimental or unfavourable treatment" in contexts unrelated to where the data was collected; risk assessments predicting whether someone will commit a crime "based solely on the profiling of a natural person"; and building facial-recognition databases "through the untargeted scraping of facial images from the internet or CCTV".
Two bans that reach into work and school. It is prohibited to use AI "to infer emotions of a natural person in the areas of workplace and education institutions", except for medical or safety reasons. And biometric categorisation is banned where it deduces a person's "race, political opinions, trade union membership, religious or philosophical beliefs, sex life or sexual orientation".
Face recognition in public — banned, with exceptions. "Real-time" remote biometric identification in publicly accessible spaces for law enforcement is prohibited "unless and in so far as such use is strictly necessary" for one of three objectives: the targeted search for specific victims of abduction, trafficking or sexual exploitation and for missing persons; preventing a specific, substantial and imminent threat to life or a terrorist attack; or locating a suspect for offences punishable by at least four years' custody.
What a breach costs (Article 99). Using a prohibited practice draws administrative fines of "up to EUR 35 000 000 or, if the offender is an undertaking, up to 7 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher". That is stricter than the GDPR, where the ceiling is EUR 20 million or 4 %.

Who decided what, and when

2021-04-21
European Commission
Tabled the proposal — 52021PC0206
2021-04-21
European Commission services
Published the impact assessment — 52021SC0084
2021-04-21
European Commission services
Published the impact assessment — 52021SC0085
2024-06-13
Parliament and Council
The act was adopted and published in the Official Journal.
date not recorded
European Parliament committee
Tabled the committee report — A-9-2023-0188
date not recorded
European Parliament committee
Tabled the committee report — CJ40-PR-731563
date not recorded
European Parliament
Adopted Parliament's position — TA-9-2023-0236
date not recorded
European Parliament
Adopted Parliament's position — TA-9-2024-0138
date not recorded
Parliament and Council
Reached a provisional agreement — CJ40-AG-758862

Every record: lobbyists, meetings, amendments, votes → · All preparatory documents →

Who is responsible? Questions people ask

Has the act already been softened?

Yes, once, before most of its obligations applied. On 19 November 2025 the Commission tabled a "digital omnibus" proposal to simplify the implementation of the harmonised AI rules; it became Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 on 8 July 2026 — 231 days. A second proposal, reaching into medical devices, is still pending. For comparison, the packaging regulation's fix was proposed in December 2025 and is still not law.

Who negotiated it in Parliament?

Two co-rapporteurs carried the file — Brando Benifei (S&D, Italy) and Dragoş Tudorache (Renew, Romania) — negotiating with twelve shadow rapporteurs from the other political groups. Two committees were jointly responsible (IMCO and LIBE) and five more gave opinions. The full list, with links to their Parliament profiles, is below.

Did Lithuania take a position on the proposal?

We hold no public record. The Seimas series of specialised-committee conclusions on EU proposals ends in July 2016, and this proposal was tabled in April 2021. Later positions are prepared in an internal system and are not published — they can be requested from the Seimas Committee on European Affairs or the Foreign Ministry.

How the act has already been changed

Amendments that became law, and how long each took from the Commission's proposal to adoption. This is the answer to "can this be changed at all" — from the EU's own register.

What changedProposedBecame lawTook
as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) (Text with EEA relevance)
32026R1744
2025-11-192026-07-08231 days

What is being done now

2025-12-16pending
A proposal to amend this act has been tabled — as regards simplifying and reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/123 as regards the support of the European Medicines Agency for the expert panels on medical devices and Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as regards the list of Union harmonisation legislation referred to in its Annex I. Not yet law.

Where you can act

  1. Your MEPs
    They vote on changes to this act. The list is below; each EP profile carries a contact form and an e-mail address.
  2. European Commission public consultations
    Every initiative implementing or amending this act goes out for public consultation; anyone may file, entries are published, and the Commission must summarise them.
  3. European Parliament Petitions Committee (PETI)
    Any EU resident may petition about the application of an EU act; the committee must examine it.

Who steered it through Parliament

The rapporteur drafts Parliament's position; the shadow rapporteurs negotiate against them for the other political groups. Between them they decide what survives into the text.

Adoption procedure · 2021/0106(COD)

committee responsible: IMCO, LIBE · committees giving an opinion: CULT, ENVI, ITRE, JURI, TRAN

MemberGroup
Brando BENIFEIrapporteurS&D ITEP profile ↗
Dragoş TUDORACHErapporteurEP profile ↗
Axel VOSSshadow rapporteurEP profile ↗
Cornelia ERNSTshadow rapporteurThe Left DEEP profile ↗
Deirdre CLUNEshadow rapporteurPPE IEEP profile ↗
Jaak MADISONshadow rapporteurID EEEP profile ↗
Jean-Lin LACAPELLEshadow rapporteurID FREP profile ↗
Kateřina KONEČNÁshadow rapporteurThe Left CZEP profile ↗
Kim VAN SPARRENTAKshadow rapporteurEP profile ↗
Kosma ZŁOTOWSKIshadow rapporteurECR PLEP profile ↗
Petar VITANOVshadow rapporteurS&D BGEP profile ↗
Rob ROOKENshadow rapporteurECR NLEP profile ↗
Sergey LAGODINSKYshadow rapporteurVerts/ALE DEEP profile ↗
Svenja HAHNshadow rapporteurRenew DEEP profile ↗

How to find your own MEP

This page shows who steered the act, not who represents you — that depends on your country. The European Parliament's own search lets you pick your member state.

Search MEPs by country ↗

Measures notified to the Commission as transposing this act

What Lithuania NOTIFIED to the European Commission (EUR-Lex sector 7) as measures transposing this act — not an assessment of implementation.

Regulations apply directly – no transposing measures are notified.

Latest coverage of this act

At most two articles per outlet; the full press record is on the footprint page.