← į akto dosjė

PPWR — 4 straipsnis

Straipsnio tekstas

4 straipsnis Laisvas judėjimas 1. Pakuotė gali būti pateikiama rinkai tik jeigu ji atitinka šį reglamentą. 2. Valstybės narės nedraudžia, neriboja ir nekliudo pateikti rinkai pakuočių, atitinkančių 5–12 straipsniuose arba pagal juos nustatytus tvarumo, ženklinimo ir informacijos teikimo reikalavimus. 3. Jeigu valstybės narės nusprendžia palikti galioti arba nustatyti nacionalinius tvarumo ar informacijos teikimo reikalavimus, kuriais papildomi šiame reglamente nustatyti reikalavimai, tie reikalavimai negali prieštarauti šiame reglamente nustatytiems reikalavimams ir valstybės narės nedraudžia, neriboja ar nekliudo pateikti rinkai šį reglamentą atitinkančių pakuočių dėl priežasčių, susijusių su neatitiktimi tiems nacionaliniams reikalavimams. 4. Valstybės narės nekliudo šio reglamento neatitinkančių pakuočių rodyti prekybos mugėse, parodose ar panašiuose renginiuose, jeigu yra matomas ženklas, iš kurio aišku, kad tokia pakuotė neatitinka šio reglamento ir kad ji neskirta parduoti iki bus užtikrinta jos atitiktis reikalavimams. II SKYRIUS TVARUMO REIKALAVIMAI

Kas bandė keisti komitete

Komiteto stadijos pakeitimai, taikyti būtent šiam straipsniui, pagal frakcijas. Pagrindimai — pažodžiui, pačių teikėjų.

FrakcijaPakeitimų
ID36
PPE27
Renew7
7
The Left6
ECR4
S&D2
NI1

Šaltinis: komiteto pakeitimų dokumentai. n = 27 pakeitimų, kurių taikinys — šis straipsnis.

Jessica Polfjärd, Henna Virkkunen — Article 4 – paragraph 4
This Regulation should be harmonised to the greatest extent possible in order to uphold the internal market.
Pernille Weiss, Jessica Polfjärd — Article 4 – paragraph 4
Additional national requirements could risk fragmentation of the internal market.
Massimiliano Salini, Francesca Peppucci, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Fulvio Martusciello, Adam Jarubas, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Dolors Montserrat — Article 4 – paragraph 5
The purpose of the Commission's proposal, as stated in Art. 11, is to harmonize the labeling requirements for various packaging. Such national flexibility, by leading to different labeling requirements among member states, would hamper the free circulation of goods and their packaging, undermining the single market and the intended purpose of transitioning from a directive to a regulation.

Ką dėl šio straipsnio balsavo plenarinėje sesijoje

Kiekvienas balsavimas dėl šio straipsnio pakeitimų — iš balsavimo rezultatų protokolo. Juosta rodo balsų pasiskirstymą; užvedus — tikslūs skaičiai.

Amuž/prieš/susilaikėLT balsaiFrakcijos
485atmesta283/332/2Am 485: +283 / −332 / ~2

Šaltinis: Europos Parlamento balsavimo rezultatų protokolai. n = 1 balsavimų dėl šio straipsnio; „LT balsai“ — kiek Lietuvos narių balsavo už/prieš tame balsavime (iš vardinio balsavimo įrašų; ne visi balsavimai vardiniai).

Kas dėl šio straipsnio rašė konsultacijose

Teikėjai, kurie savo tekste tiesiogiai nurodė būtent šį straipsnio numerį. Tai citata iš jų pačių teksto — ne mūsų vertinimas ir ne priežastinis ryšys.

76
verslo asociacija
18
įmonė
7
NVO
2
ES pilietis
2
kita
KasŠalisKą parašė
IKG crewshop24.comDEit is necessary to distinguish between: 1) additional national requirements adopted pursuant to Article 4(3) and 2) additional national requirements explicitly allowed in specific articles of the PPWR. In the case under point 1), fines are not allowed as they
CNSBII - Corpo Nazionale delle Sentinelle dei Bacini idrografici ItalianiITcuna tecnologia di riciclaggio su scala industriale che consenta di fabbricare tale polimero conformemente ai processi di cui all'articolo 4, paragrafo 3, di detto regolamento». Infine, entro il 1o gennaio 2028, la Commissione valuterà la necessità di conceder
Zaiser Art GbRDEigen Zustands, in dem regelkonforme Unternehmen zahlen und schließen, während Nichtbefolgung folgenlos bleibt. Die PPWR soll laut Artikel 4 den Binnenmarkt für Verpackungen vollenden. Für uns hat ihr Registrierungsrahmen ihn am 12.08.2026 in 13 Ländern beendet
MLcognises that micro-enterprises should not carry disproportionate obligations. It exempts them from technical documentation under Article 4 and then hands them the full EPR registration and representation burden anyway. That is incoherent. If the intention was
E.I. AURORE SARRAZINFR(UE) 2025/40 du 19 décembre 2024 (JO L, 2025/40, 22.1.2025), version française : article 3 §1 pt 13, 15, 20, 23 (p. 32- 33) · article 4 (p. 37) · article 15 §12 (p. 52) · article 17 (p. 52-53) · article 21 (p. 55) · article 29 §13 (p. 61) · article 44 §1, §2,
Ecommerce businessDEwith the PPWR's purpose. The Regulation is based on Article 114 TFEU and seeks to improve the functioning of the internal market. Article 4 protects the free movement of compliant packaging. Yet Articles 4447 preserve a system in which a business faces separat
BDE Bundesverband der Deutschen Entsorgungs-, Wasser- und KreislaufwirtschaftDEcedence over recycling. However, this principle must be applied in a differentiated and evidence-based manner, as provided for in Article 4 (2) of the Waste Framework Directive, which states that, when applying the waste hierachy, Member States shall take meas
KUNSTSTOFF.Swiss - Swiss Plastics AssociationCHVerpackungen bei der Implementa3on der Wiederverwendungsvorgaben vor. Dies folgt auch aus der Anwendung der Abfallhierarchie nach Art. 4 Abs. 2 EU- Abfallrahmenrichtlinie (2008/98), wonach derjenigen Maßnahme der Vorrang eingeräumt wird, die „insgesamt das bes
IK Industrievereinigung KunststoffverpackungenDE5(4) TEU) and the principle of objective impossibility. This also follows from the application of the waste hierarchy pursuant to Article 4(2) of the EU Waste Framework Directive (2008/98), according to which priority is given to the measure that ‘deliver the
NRK VerpakkingenNL(artikel 5, lid 4, VEU) en het beginsel van objectieve onmogelijkheid. Dit volgt ook uit de toepassing van de afvalhiërarchie van artikel 4, lid 2, van de Kaderrichtlijn afvalstoffen (2008/98/EG), die voorschrijft dat voorrang wordt gegeven aan maatregelen die
Gemeinschaft Papiersackindustrie e.V.DEobliga tions would compromise hygiene, food safety and achieving the best overall envi- ronmental outcome in line with EC 2008/98 article 4 paragraph 2. (d) evidence that the obligations in para- graphs 1 - 13 are environmentally beneficia safe and economicall
Japan Business Council in Europe (JBCE)BEes should not be allowed to introduce further labelling requirements for the purpose of identifying EPR schemes, as prescribed in Art. 4(5) and Art. 11(8), and that Art. 11(7) should explicitly prevent the introduction of requirements on packaging sustainabili
Fachvereinigung Hartpapierwaren und Rundgefäße (FHR)DEthe objectives of the PPWR. Establishment of a standard Europe wide approach to dealing with packaging waste (Art. 4) The harmonisation to be achieved by moving from a directive to a regulation must not be thwarted by allowing Member States to go beyond the re
IKEM - Innovation and Chemical Industries in SwedenSEmental objectives of the regulation. Below are comments on selected articles with particular importance for our member companies. Article 4 - Free movement Article 4(4) opens the possibility of specific national solutions and requirements. IKEM considers that
Technology Industries of FinlandFIntal impacts of packaging. This would also be in alignment with the objectives of the Waste Hierarchy whose principles note that (Article 4) “the options that deliver the best overall environmental outcome” should be chosen and that “this may require specific
GROW InternationalFRes should not be allowed to introduce further labelling requirements for the purpose of identifying EPR schemes, as prescribed in Art. 4 (5) and Art. 11 (8), and Art.
AmcorBE2023)2889454 - 24/04/2023 2 Requirements that are missing completely from the PPWR Lifecycle thinking (otherwise mandated via WFD Article 4) Despite attempting to curb packaging waste pollution and increase secondary raw materials on the EU market, the PPWR mi
Confederation of Swedish EnterpriseSE2050, by laying down measures in line with the hierarchy of waste in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC. Art 1.4 (new) This Regulation contributes to the shifting to a biobased economy, by laying down measures accordance with Bioeconomy Action P
Metsä GroupFIand technological implications, encouraging packaging solutions with the best environmental performance, in line with paragraph 2 article 4 of the Waste Framework Directive, according to which operators can depart from the waste hierarchy when this is justifie
Stiftung Initiative MehrwegDEDirective 2018/852/EC (PPWD: Packaging and Pack- aging Waste Di- rective). § 5 (1) In line with the waste hierarchy laid down in Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC, Member States shall take measures to encourage the increase in the share of reusable packaging
Industrieverband Papier- und Folienverpackung e.V. (IPV)DEthe objectives of the PPWR. Establishment of a standard Europe wide approach to dealing with packaging waste (Art. 4) The harmonisation to be achieved by moving from a directive to a regulation must not be thwarted by allowing Member States to go beyond the re
DIE PAPIERINDUSTRIE e. V.DEnationale Alleingänge konterkariert werden. Den Mitgliedstaaten sollten keine umfassenden Handlungsspielräume eingeräumt werden. Artikel 4 (4) PPWR sollte ersatzlos gestri- chen und auf eine Erweiterung der Rechtsgrundlage auf die Umweltkompetenz gemäß Art. 1
Wirtschaftskammer ÖsterreichATnden Kennzeichnungen. Auch alle Pfand- und EPR-Kennzeichnungen sollten verbindlich EU-weit harmonisiert sein. Die Abs 4 und 5 des Art 4 sind daher zu streichen. Verpackungen zu Ausstellungszwecken dürfen auf Messen laut Abs 6 präsentiert werden, auch wenn dies
AESGP - Association of the European Self-Care IndustryBEged goods, including consumer healthcare products, within the EU. In this context, we are concerned that certain provisions (e.g. Article 4) will allow Member States to maintain or introduce specific requirements at the national level. • Several provisions in
Comité Européen des Entreprises Vins (CEEV)BEan effective labelling solution to provide product-specific packaging and recycling information to consumers. In compliance with article 4 of the draft regulation, the scope of such possibility should however be 5 enlarged to include all types of information
UMVINFRd 2 shall not apply to the following: (a) immediate packaging as defined in Article 1, point (23), of Directive 2001/83/EC and in Article 4, point (25), of Regulation (EU) 2019/6; (b) contact sensitive plastic packaging of medical devices covered by Regulation
Cooperativas Agro-alimentarias de EspañaESaging products thus restricting and impeding the placing on the marked of packaging that otherwise comply with the regulation. On Art. 4, which covers free movement, Copa and Cogeca therefore call for the deletion of para 5, to prevent distortions of the inter
European Paper Packaging AllianceBEtified by life-cycle thinking on the overall impacts of the generation and management of such waste. (Waste Directive 2008/98/EC, article 4§2) The need for robust & representative LCAs QSR provides a standard EU study case • A comparable system across EU • A f
ANAIPEScle shall not apply to the following: (a) immediate packaging as defined in Article 1, point (23), of Directive 2001/83/EC and in Article 4, point 25, of Regulation (EU) 2019/6; (b) contact sensitive plastic packaging of medical devices covered by Regulation (
The Polish Union Of the Cosmetics IndustryPLry packaging. It would also make it easier to recycle small pack formats that are currently not recyclable. str. 6 Free movement (Article 4) COM TEXT PROPOSED AMENDMENT Art.

Šaltinis: viešų konsultacijų atsiliepimai ir pozicijų dokumentai. n = 108 paminėjimų; skaičiuojama pažodinė nuoroda į straipsnio numerį.

Klausti apie šį straipsnį →