← back to the act's dossier

PPWR — Article 4

The article's text

Article 4 Free movement 1. Packaging shall only be placed on the market if it complies with this Regulation. 2. Member States shall not prohibit, restrict or impede the placing on the market of packaging that complies with the sustainability, labelling and information requirements laid down in or pursuant to Articles 5 to 12. 3. If Member States choose to maintain or introduce national sustainability requirements, or information requirements additional to those laid down in this Regulation, those requirements shall not conflict with those laid down in this Regulation and the Member States shall not prohibit, restrict or impede the placing on the market of packaging that complies with this Regulation for reasons of non-compliance with those national requirements. 4. At trade fairs, exhibitions or similar events, Member States shall not prevent the showing of packaging which does not comply with this Regulation, provided that a visible sign clearly indicates that such packaging does not comply with this Regulation and that it is not for sale until it has been brought into conformity. CHAPTER II SUSTAINABILITY REQUIREMENTS

Who tried to change it in committee

Committee-stage amendments targeting exactly this article, by political group. Justifications verbatim, in the authors' own words.

GroupAmendments
ID36
PPE27
Renew7
7
The Left6
ECR4
S&D2
NI1

Source: the committee amendment documents. n = 27 amendments targeting this article.

Jessica Polfjärd, Henna Virkkunen — Article 4 – paragraph 4
This Regulation should be harmonised to the greatest extent possible in order to uphold the internal market.
Pernille Weiss, Jessica Polfjärd — Article 4 – paragraph 4
Additional national requirements could risk fragmentation of the internal market.
Massimiliano Salini, Francesca Peppucci, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Fulvio Martusciello, Adam Jarubas, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Dolors Montserrat — Article 4 – paragraph 5
The purpose of the Commission's proposal, as stated in Art. 11, is to harmonize the labeling requirements for various packaging. Such national flexibility, by leading to different labeling requirements among member states, would hamper the free circulation of goods and their packaging, undermining the single market and the intended purpose of transitioning from a directive to a regulation.

What plenary voted on this article

Every vote on this article's amendments, from the voting-results minutes. The bar shows the split; hover for exact counts.

Amfor/against/abstainedLT votesGroups
485rejected283/332/2Am 485: +283 / −332 / ~2

Source: the European Parliament's voting-results minutes. n = 1 votes on this article; 'LT votes' is how many Lithuanian members voted for/against in that vote (from roll-call records; not every vote is a roll-call).

Who wrote about this article in the consultations

Filers who named this exact article number in their own text. It is their sentence, not our reading — and not a causal claim.

76
business association
18
company
7
NGO
2
EU citizen
2
other
WhoCountryWhat they wrote
IKG crewshop24.comDEit is necessary to distinguish between: 1) additional national requirements adopted pursuant to Article 4(3) and 2) additional national requirements explicitly allowed in specific articles of the PPWR. In the case under point 1), fines are not allowed as they
CNSBII - Corpo Nazionale delle Sentinelle dei Bacini idrografici ItalianiITcuna tecnologia di riciclaggio su scala industriale che consenta di fabbricare tale polimero conformemente ai processi di cui all'articolo 4, paragrafo 3, di detto regolamento». Infine, entro il 1o gennaio 2028, la Commissione valuterà la necessità di conceder
Zaiser Art GbRDEigen Zustands, in dem regelkonforme Unternehmen zahlen und schließen, während Nichtbefolgung folgenlos bleibt. Die PPWR soll laut Artikel 4 den Binnenmarkt für Verpackungen vollenden. Für uns hat ihr Registrierungsrahmen ihn am 12.08.2026 in 13 Ländern beendet
MLcognises that micro-enterprises should not carry disproportionate obligations. It exempts them from technical documentation under Article 4 and then hands them the full EPR registration and representation burden anyway. That is incoherent. If the intention was
E.I. AURORE SARRAZINFR(UE) 2025/40 du 19 décembre 2024 (JO L, 2025/40, 22.1.2025), version française : article 3 §1 pt 13, 15, 20, 23 (p. 32- 33) · article 4 (p. 37) · article 15 §12 (p. 52) · article 17 (p. 52-53) · article 21 (p. 55) · article 29 §13 (p. 61) · article 44 §1, §2,
Ecommerce businessDEwith the PPWR's purpose. The Regulation is based on Article 114 TFEU and seeks to improve the functioning of the internal market. Article 4 protects the free movement of compliant packaging. Yet Articles 4447 preserve a system in which a business faces separat
BDE Bundesverband der Deutschen Entsorgungs-, Wasser- und KreislaufwirtschaftDEcedence over recycling. However, this principle must be applied in a differentiated and evidence-based manner, as provided for in Article 4 (2) of the Waste Framework Directive, which states that, when applying the waste hierachy, Member States shall take meas
KUNSTSTOFF.Swiss - Swiss Plastics AssociationCHVerpackungen bei der Implementa3on der Wiederverwendungsvorgaben vor. Dies folgt auch aus der Anwendung der Abfallhierarchie nach Art. 4 Abs. 2 EU- Abfallrahmenrichtlinie (2008/98), wonach derjenigen Maßnahme der Vorrang eingeräumt wird, die „insgesamt das bes
IK Industrievereinigung KunststoffverpackungenDE5(4) TEU) and the principle of objective impossibility. This also follows from the application of the waste hierarchy pursuant to Article 4(2) of the EU Waste Framework Directive (2008/98), according to which priority is given to the measure that ‘deliver the
NRK VerpakkingenNL(artikel 5, lid 4, VEU) en het beginsel van objectieve onmogelijkheid. Dit volgt ook uit de toepassing van de afvalhiërarchie van artikel 4, lid 2, van de Kaderrichtlijn afvalstoffen (2008/98/EG), die voorschrijft dat voorrang wordt gegeven aan maatregelen die
Gemeinschaft Papiersackindustrie e.V.DEobliga tions would compromise hygiene, food safety and achieving the best overall envi- ronmental outcome in line with EC 2008/98 article 4 paragraph 2. (d) evidence that the obligations in para- graphs 1 - 13 are environmentally beneficia safe and economicall
Japan Business Council in Europe (JBCE)BEes should not be allowed to introduce further labelling requirements for the purpose of identifying EPR schemes, as prescribed in Art. 4(5) and Art. 11(8), and that Art. 11(7) should explicitly prevent the introduction of requirements on packaging sustainabili
Fachvereinigung Hartpapierwaren und Rundgefäße (FHR)DEthe objectives of the PPWR. Establishment of a standard Europe wide approach to dealing with packaging waste (Art. 4) The harmonisation to be achieved by moving from a directive to a regulation must not be thwarted by allowing Member States to go beyond the re
IKEM - Innovation and Chemical Industries in SwedenSEmental objectives of the regulation. Below are comments on selected articles with particular importance for our member companies. Article 4 - Free movement Article 4(4) opens the possibility of specific national solutions and requirements. IKEM considers that
Technology Industries of FinlandFIntal impacts of packaging. This would also be in alignment with the objectives of the Waste Hierarchy whose principles note that (Article 4) “the options that deliver the best overall environmental outcome” should be chosen and that “this may require specific
GROW InternationalFRes should not be allowed to introduce further labelling requirements for the purpose of identifying EPR schemes, as prescribed in Art. 4 (5) and Art. 11 (8), and Art.
AmcorBE2023)2889454 - 24/04/2023 2 Requirements that are missing completely from the PPWR Lifecycle thinking (otherwise mandated via WFD Article 4) Despite attempting to curb packaging waste pollution and increase secondary raw materials on the EU market, the PPWR mi
Confederation of Swedish EnterpriseSE2050, by laying down measures in line with the hierarchy of waste in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC. Art 1.4 (new) This Regulation contributes to the shifting to a biobased economy, by laying down measures accordance with Bioeconomy Action P
Metsä GroupFIand technological implications, encouraging packaging solutions with the best environmental performance, in line with paragraph 2 article 4 of the Waste Framework Directive, according to which operators can depart from the waste hierarchy when this is justifie
Stiftung Initiative MehrwegDEDirective 2018/852/EC (PPWD: Packaging and Pack- aging Waste Di- rective). § 5 (1) In line with the waste hierarchy laid down in Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC, Member States shall take measures to encourage the increase in the share of reusable packaging
Industrieverband Papier- und Folienverpackung e.V. (IPV)DEthe objectives of the PPWR. Establishment of a standard Europe wide approach to dealing with packaging waste (Art. 4) The harmonisation to be achieved by moving from a directive to a regulation must not be thwarted by allowing Member States to go beyond the re
DIE PAPIERINDUSTRIE e. V.DEnationale Alleingänge konterkariert werden. Den Mitgliedstaaten sollten keine umfassenden Handlungsspielräume eingeräumt werden. Artikel 4 (4) PPWR sollte ersatzlos gestri- chen und auf eine Erweiterung der Rechtsgrundlage auf die Umweltkompetenz gemäß Art. 1
Wirtschaftskammer ÖsterreichATnden Kennzeichnungen. Auch alle Pfand- und EPR-Kennzeichnungen sollten verbindlich EU-weit harmonisiert sein. Die Abs 4 und 5 des Art 4 sind daher zu streichen. Verpackungen zu Ausstellungszwecken dürfen auf Messen laut Abs 6 präsentiert werden, auch wenn dies
AESGP - Association of the European Self-Care IndustryBEged goods, including consumer healthcare products, within the EU. In this context, we are concerned that certain provisions (e.g. Article 4) will allow Member States to maintain or introduce specific requirements at the national level. • Several provisions in
Comité Européen des Entreprises Vins (CEEV)BEan effective labelling solution to provide product-specific packaging and recycling information to consumers. In compliance with article 4 of the draft regulation, the scope of such possibility should however be 5 enlarged to include all types of information
UMVINFRd 2 shall not apply to the following: (a) immediate packaging as defined in Article 1, point (23), of Directive 2001/83/EC and in Article 4, point (25), of Regulation (EU) 2019/6; (b) contact sensitive plastic packaging of medical devices covered by Regulation
Cooperativas Agro-alimentarias de EspañaESaging products thus restricting and impeding the placing on the marked of packaging that otherwise comply with the regulation. On Art. 4, which covers free movement, Copa and Cogeca therefore call for the deletion of para 5, to prevent distortions of the inter
European Paper Packaging AllianceBEtified by life-cycle thinking on the overall impacts of the generation and management of such waste. (Waste Directive 2008/98/EC, article 4§2) The need for robust & representative LCAs QSR provides a standard EU study case • A comparable system across EU • A f
ANAIPEScle shall not apply to the following: (a) immediate packaging as defined in Article 1, point (23), of Directive 2001/83/EC and in Article 4, point 25, of Regulation (EU) 2019/6; (b) contact sensitive plastic packaging of medical devices covered by Regulation (
The Polish Union Of the Cosmetics IndustryPLry packaging. It would also make it easier to recycle small pack formats that are currently not recyclable. str. 6 Free movement (Article 4) COM TEXT PROPOSED AMENDMENT Art.

Source: public consultation submissions and position papers. n = 108 mentions; counted as a literal reference to the article number.

Ask about this article →