Filers who named this exact article number in their own text. It is their sentence, not our reading — and not a causal claim.
| Who | Country | What they wrote |
|---|---|---|
| European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations EFPIA | BE | tellectual property rights. Cost of detention, storage and destruction EFPIA members would welcome additional explanation for how article 76(2) will take effect for pharmaceuticals, given that the MoH is on most occasions the party handling the seized medicine ↗ |
| International Trademark Association (INTA) | BE | d ancillary costs. INTA is of the view that the UCC shall provide more clarification on how to regulate the issue. To ensure that Article 76(1) is consistent with Regulation 608/2013, we would recommend that the term “holder of the goods” be added to the list ↗ |
| Aktionskreis gegen Produkt- und Markenpiraterie e.V. | DE | zu keinen Wertungswidersprüchen führen. Insofern ist es sehr zu begrüßen, dass auch die Kosten für die Vernichtung von Waren nach Art. 76 vom Importeur oder Exporteur zu tragen sind. ↗ |
| AIM - European Brands Association | BE | “The costs of the destruction shall be borne by the importer, exporter or holder of the goods”. Clarification is also needed for Article 76(2): “Where the destruction is to be conducted under the responsibility of a holder of a decision of an intellectual pro ↗ |
| The Imaging Consumable Coalition of Europe, Middle East and Africa | GB | the rights holders’ perspective, ICCE welcomes that the costs of the destruction shall be borne by the importer or the exporter (Article 76). ↗ |
Source: public consultation submissions and position papers. n = 5 mentions; counted as a literal reference to the article number.