Filers who named this exact article number in their own text. It is their sentence, not our reading — and not a causal claim.
| Who | Country | What they wrote |
|---|---|---|
| EY | BE | for the place where the importer or the exporter is established (Article 42, para. 4, sub e, of the proposal). EY Europe SCRL/CVBA De Kleetlaan 2 1831 Diegem 5 We observe that it is not clear how the fulfillment of obligations related to other taxes (e.g., imp ↗ |
| Student contribution (Maastricht University) | NL | SARL [2013] ECJ ECLI:EU:C:2013:466. 132 Case C-454/10 Oliver Jestel v Hauptzollamt Aachen [2011] ECJ ECLI:EU:C:2011:752. 133 UCC Article 42. 134 TEU Article 4(3). 135 ibid Article 4. 136 TFEU Article 325(1). 27 discuss the Commission v UK,137 to show the firm ↗ |
| University of Bologna - PhD thesis | IT | rends to render those principles of general application throughout national tax legislation. For instance, it is worth mentioning Article 42 of the UCC is aimed at ensuring that national sanctioning systems are consistent with στρατιώτας καὶ χρήματα, καὶ ταῦτα ↗ |
Source: public consultation submissions and position papers. n = 3 mentions; counted as a literal reference to the article number.