EU footprint: Excise Duty Directive

Council Directive (EU) 2020/262 laying down the general arrangements for excise duty
directive · CELEX 32020L0262 · built 2026-09-01

registered lobbyists naming this act
meetings with the Commission
public submissions
parliament scrutinies
How to read this page. This shows co-occurrence, not causation: that an organisation followed this act or met the Commission does not by itself mean it shaped the outcome. Every number is a direct count from official EU registers.

Who followed this act (EU Transparency Register)

CountryOrganisations
BG1
ES1
FR1
GB1
LV1
BE1
LU1

Source: EU Transparency Register. n = 7 organisations naming this act in their register entry; x = country of seat, y = number of organisations.

OrganisationCountryCategoryDeclared lobbying cost
Tobacco Europe AISBL BETrade and business associations200000–299999
Brain Health Council Foundation BGNon-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar
BLN PALAO ABOGADOS, S.L.P. ESLaw firms50000–99999
EUROPEAN EXCISE ASSOCIATION FRTrade and business associations
British American Tobacco GBCompanies & groups300000–399999
Manufacture de Tabacs Heintz van Landewyck LUCompanies & groups200000–299999
Bezdūmu nozares asociācija LVNon-governmental organisations, platforms and networks and similar10000–24999

Meetings with the Commission

Meetings the Commission itself publishes, matched to the same organisations by Transparency Register id — not by name.

When the meetings happened, and with whom

QuarterMeetings
2017 Q11
2020 Q31
2022 Q22
2025 Q22

Source: meetings published by the European Commission. n = 6 meetings with organisations naming this act; x = quarter of the meeting date, y = meetings.

Most frequent hostsMeetingsMost frequent attendeesMeetings
Taxation and Customs Union3British American Tobacco3
Competition1Tobacco Europe AISBL2
Cabinet of Commissioner Ekaterina Zaharieva1175323916168-032
Cabinet of Commissioner Phil Hogan127567784437-462
734628928687-452
17882036839-352
79170323734-592
92802501097-372
Only meetings with Commissioners, their cabinets and Directors-General are published. An early meeting is not evidence of influence on the outcome — it shows access, and should be read as exactly that.

Public feedback (Have your say)

Read what they wrote → — verbatim quotes, positions, and who raised problems.

CountrySubmissionsSubmitter typeSubmissions
BG329EU_CITIZEN336
BE47COMPANY88
CZ31BUSINESS_ASSOCIATION52
FR19NGO36
ES15OTHER8
IT14TRADE_UNION6
SE13NON_EU_CITIZEN5
DE12PUBLIC_AUTHORITY3
AT9ACADEMIC_RESEARCH_INSTITTUTION3
PL7CONSUMER_ORGANISATION2

Source: the Have-your-say portal. n = 541 submissions tagged with this act; counted by the country and type each filer declared.

Who supported, who raised problems — by submitter type

Stance is keyword-scored, not semantic — a temperature reading, not a vote. Every number opens as the list of records it was counted from.

Submitter typeraises concernssupportsother
EU citizen31332
company2086
business association8044
NGO11025
other206
trade union105
non-EU citizen104
public authority003

Positions from academics, NGOs and unions

Selected on the submitter type each filer declared: research institutions, NGOs, environmental and consumer organisations, trade unions. Business associations appear in the sections above.

Branża spirytusowa zidentyfikowała obszar, w którym konieczne są zmiany stawek podatku akcyzowego. Zmiany powinny zmierzać do zmniejszenia istniejącej od 1992 r. różnicy między różnymi kategoriami napojów alkoholowych, która stawia napoje spirytusowe w niekorzystnej sytuacji w porównaniu z innymi kategoriami napojów alkoholowych. Obecny kształt dyrektywy ingeruje w rynek, zapewniając przewagę konkurencyjną producentom piwa i wina, co jest szczególnie trudne dla małych i rzemieślniczych wytwórców napojów spirytusowych. Ten sam alkohol znajduje się w piwie i w alkoholach mocnych, powinien być…
Croatian Chamber of Agriculture · NGO · HR · 2022-07-04 ↗ official source
Croatian Chamber of Agriculture First and foremost, it is critical distinguishing between use and abuse and recognising that harmful alcohol consumption has been steadily declining in the EU in the past decade. Tax and price increases are poorly suited to targeting harmful use of alcohol, as they often bring the opposite results. Increasing taxes would run counter to the current efforts of national authorities to curb fraud and counterfeiting, nurture illicit markets and give rise to the consumption of unrecorded alcohol (cheaper but of lower quality) which in turn induce losses in tax…
The European Public Health Alliance (EPHA) is a leading European civil society alliance in Brussels, made up of 80 public health NGOs, patient groups, health professionals and disease groups, working to improve health and strengthen the voice of public health in Europe. EPHA welcomes the European Commission's evaluation of excise duty rates and tax structures on alcoholic beverages. It is timely and health of the European citizens should be part of the review of the upcoming exercise, as per the mandate of the EU. From EPHA’s perspective, it is essential to comprehensively fight…
Beoir · consumer organisation · IE · 2022-07-04 ↗ official source
We strongly support the continuation of reduced excise duty for small producers and note the highly positive effect this has had for consumers since it was introduced in Ireland in 2005. We believe there is scope for making duty rates fairer between different kinds of drinks, noting that wine can be zero-rated but beer cannot. There is no rational reason for such a distinction. Member states should have a greater freedom to set their own excise duty rates. We are unconvinced that excise duty rates can be leveraged as a public health measure and can see no indication that increasing prices…
The European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) aims to be the Home of Hepatology so that all who are involved in treating liver disease can realise their full potential to cure and prevent it. EASL welcomes the European Commission's evaluation of excise duty rates and tax structures on alcoholic beverages. According to the Global Burden of Disease, 1,256,900 deaths occurred worldwide due to liver disease in 2016, of which 334,900 (27%) were attributable to alcohol. Additionally, 245,000 liver cancer deaths were associated with alcohol intake (30% of all liver cancers deaths). In…
European Heart Network · NGO · BE · 2022-07-04 ↗ official source
The European Heart Network (EHN) welcomes the opportunity to provide input on the evaluation of the rules governing excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages. Harmful alcohol consumption is responsible for an estimated 50 000 cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths in the EU. High alcohol consumption increases the risk of CVD by raising blood pressure and blood levels of triglycerides. Consumption of three or more alcoholic drinks per day (10 g of alcohol per drink) is associated with increased CVD risk. Alcohol taxation is part of the WHO “best buys” (cost-effective interventions) as it…
European Beer Consumers Union (EBCU) · consumer organisation · BE · 2022-07-03 ↗ official source
EBCU is a non-political, non-religious organisation formed in 1990 to give voice to the beer consumer at the European level, both within and beyond the European Union (EU). Our members are different national beer organisations in European countries representing over 200 000 consumers. Having different minimum rates on duty of alcoholic beverages based on their product category is problematic. We all can agree that alcohol in bigger amounts is harmful, but with the current different excise rules some stronger alcohol drinks like wine, which has a minimum taxation level of zero, is promoted…
The European Chronic Disease Alliance (ECDA) welcomes the opportunity to provide input on the evaluation of the rules governing excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages. These have not been updated in the past 30 years (since 1992) despite market evolutions, consumption changes and continuously growing evidence on the negative impact of alcohol consumption on people’s health. It is therefore high time to consider the effectiveness of the current system and ways to improve it, with a view to pursue public health efforts in Europe – including prevention of major non-communicable diseases,…
AIM welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the on the evaluation of excise duty rates and tax structures. Increased Taxation as a best buy for Public Health Increasing the price of alcohol is one of the most cost-effective alcohol policies available. Pricing policies have also been identified by WHO as second “best buy” in the fight against non-communicable diseases. Regulating prices through increased taxation or the establishment of Minimum Unit Pricing has proved to reduce overall consumption and associated harm. Price control also has the potential to help reduce inequities and…
Deutsche Sozialversicherung Europavertretung · NGO · DE · 2022-05-20 ↗ official source
Die Deutsche Sozialversicherung (DSV) begrüßt die Konsultation der Europäischen Kommission über die geltenden Rechtsvorschriften der Verbrauchsteuersätze und Steuerstrukturen von Alkohol und alkoholischen Getränken in der Europäischen Union (EU). Der Konsultationsprozess sollte zum Ziel haben, die gesundheitsbezogenen Aspekte des Alkoholkonsums zu verdeutlichen, um zu einer Reduktion des Alkoholkonsums beizutragen. Bei der Überarbeitung der Verbrauchsteuersätze von Alkohol müssen „Öffentliche Einnahmen“ und „Gesundheitsschutz“ in Einklang gebracht werden. Noch immer ist Europa die Region mit…
Navarrabiomed · research institution · ES · 2022-05-12 ↗ official source
.
IAAP · NGO · AT · 2022-04-12 ↗ official source
Wir unterstützen eine Anpassung der Steuersätze und eine Validierung ausdrücklich im Hinsicht auf präventive Faktoren
IOGT International · NGO · DE · 2017-04-17 ↗ official source
Alcohol harm in Europe Europe is the heaviest alcohol consuming region in the world. Harms related to the high levels of alcohol use are a heavy burden on public health, social welfare and economic productivity in the European Union. For example, alcohol harm costs €155.8 in the EU every year. Alcohol harm is pervasive and a heavy burden in Europe: • Alcohol is the 3rd leading risk factor in Europe for ill health and Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) such as cancer, diabetes or heart disease. • 12 million people in the EU are alcohol dependent. • Around 9 million children in the EU are growing…
The European Public Health Alliance (EPHA) welcomes the revision of Directive 2008/118/EC. Harmful alcohol use is the fifth leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Europe is the heaviest drinking region in the world. Costs associated with harmful alcohol consumption amounted to €155.8 billion in 2010 in the EU. Measures targeting price and availability of alcohol are key to reduce alcohol related harm, as recommended by the World Health Organisation. For instance, when excise duties were reduced in Finland in 2004 this resulted in an increase in alcohol consumption and a substantial…
IOGT-NTO · NGO · SE · 2017-04-12 ↗ official source
IOGT-NTO welcomes the review of Directive 2008/118/EC and the opportunity to provide feedback to this Inception Impact Assessment (IIA). You will find our comments below and references (a, b, c) in the attached annex. Comments on context and problem definition (Part A): 1. IOGT-NTO welcomes that cross-border movement through private acquisition (article 32 of the Directive) is brought up in the problem definition part of the IIA but regrets the tentative approach. The high and indicative import quotas prevent member states from using their taxation competency to set excise duties according to…
European Alcohol Policy Alliance (Eurocare) welcomes the revision of the Directive 2008/118/EC and would like to draw the European Commission’s attention to some elements in its Inception Impact Assessment. Apart from the issues identified in the Evaluation report (Evaluation of current arrangements of the holding and moving of excise good under excise suspension) we would like to urge European Commission in the REFIT to address the issue of private acquisition of alcoholic beverages (Art 32). The general objectives list safeguarding revenue of Member States. Collection of excise duties is a…

What the national parliaments did

Member-state parliaments' reaction to the Commission's proposal — from IPEX (the interparliamentary EU information exchange). A reasoned opinion is a formal subsidiarity objection under Protocol No 2; a political dialogue is a non-binding opinion sent to the Commission.

14
Scrutiny
CountryParliament / chamberScrutinyReasoned opinionsPolitical dialogues
DEGerman Bundestagcompleted
DEGerman Bundesratcompleted
EEEstonian Parliamentin progress
ESSpanish Cortes Generales - Congress of Deputiescompleted
FIFinnish Parliamentin progress
IEIrish Houses of Oireachtascompleted
LTLithuanian Seimascompleted
LULuxembourg Chamber of Deputiesin progress
MTMaltese House of Representativescompleted
PLPolish Senatein progress
PLPolish Sejmcompleted
SESwedish Parliamentin progress
SISlovenian National Assemblycompleted
SKSlovak Republic National Councilin progress

Source: the IPEX record for proposal COM/2018/0346. n = 14 chambers that opened a scrutiny; the table lists only those. Subsidiarity deadline: 2018-10-01. ↗ IPEX

The Council's (member-state governments') voting records are no longer published as an open dataset — the Council's dataset is officially discontinued and its website refuses programmatic access. The voting results survive only inside meeting minutes.

News about this act

Publications that cover this act.

DateOutletExcerpt
2023-01-18Packaging EuropeThis announcement follows the recent news regarding proposed revisions to the EU’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive. These came in the form of plans to introduce…
2026-08-26NuevaradioThe new directive The Commission’s proposed update to the Tobacco Taxation Directive aims to raise tobacco and nicotine product prices significantly by increasing…
2026-08-18Euronews.comHowever, it warns that these older laws left gaping loopholes that allowed high-tech nicotine alternatives, like novel products, to thrive unregulated. The new directive…
2024-12-16consilium.europa.eu- Conseil de l'Union européenne - Communiqué de presse - 16 décembre 2024 10:00 Emballages durables: le Conseil approuve de nouvelles règles pour diminuer le volume de…
2026-08-19Brussels SignalThe Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (EU) 2025/40 entered into force on February 11, 2025 and applies in substance from August 12, 2026. It replaces the previous…
2026-08-05kpmg.comIn relation to the effective dates, Directive No. 2 of 2026, concerning VAT adjustments following a registrant’s exit from a VAT group, expressly takes effect from 1…
2026-08-21JD SupraDistance Financial and Other Services: EU Withdrawal Function and Related Consumer Rules Now Apply As of June 19, 2026, Directive (EU) 2023/2673 has become fully…
2026-08-14Vietnam.vnAutres cas prévus par la législation douanière. La circulaire précise que les documents de déclaration fiscale pour les marchandises exportées et importées sont des…