Filers who named this exact article number in their own text. It is their sentence, not our reading — and not a causal claim.
| Who | Country | What they wrote |
|---|---|---|
| Information Accountability Foundation | US | The IAF recognises the importance of independence for all DPAs but there is evidence that the notion of complete independence in Article 52 of GDPR has become counterproductive. Such a notion can develop a situation where data protection authorities downplay ↗ |
| Van Bael & Bellis | BE | as an excessive compliance burden (red tape), causing legal uncertainty. This can constitute a disproportionate interference (cf. Article 52(1) of the Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the EU (CFR))5 with the freedom to conduct a business (Article 16 CFR) a ↗ |
| Oplysningsforbundet May Day | DK | direktiv 2009/136, sammenholdt med artikel 7, 8 og 11 samt artikel 52, stk. 1 i chartret om grundlæggende rettigheder. Og sagen om den ulovlige telelogning er ikke afsluttet endnu: ”Foreningen Imod Ulovlig Logning” er lykkedes med at få rejst sagen om regering ↗ |
| David BARNARD-WILLS | GB | DPAs and are therefore responsible for determining if the authorities have adequate resources to meet their mandated objectives. Article 52(4) GDPR requires Member States to provide the necessary human, technical and financial resources for the effective perf ↗ |
| Open Rights Group | GB | their national Supervisory Authorities, and on the European Commission to ensure that Member States meet their obligations under Article 52(4) of the GDPR. 1. ↗ |
| David Erdos | GB | infrastructure necessary for the effective performance of its tasks and exercise of its powers” (GDPR, art. 52(4)). However, it must also involve strengthening DPA accountability mechanisms so as to ensure that independent organs including courts and tribunals ↗ |
| Pinsent Masons | IE | They are also required to participate in the EDPB and foster harmonisation across all of the supervisory authorities. Article 52(4) of the 4 GDPR specifically requires that each Member State ensures that its supervisory authority "is provided with the human, t ↗ |
| AFME - Association for Financial Markets in Europe | BE | to assess the level of consistency and cooperation amongst data protection authorities within the EEA. Although, and as stated in Article 52 of the Regulation, data protection authorities are independent supervisory authorities responsible for monitoring the a ↗ |
| Fundamental Rights European Experts Group (FREE-Group) | BE | call on the European Commission to launch an infringement procedure against EU Member State Governments for failing to implement Article 52(4) of the GDPR. In addition, we note that the cooperation and consistency mechanisms in the GDPR do not function approp ↗ |
| Secretariat of COMECE (Commission of the Episcopates of the European Union) | BE | GDPR on "Existing data protection rules of churches and religious associations" (on which more at pages 4-5). In accordance with Article 52.3 CFR, Article 10 CFR covers the collective, as well as the institutional dimension of freedom of religion, as outlined ↗ |
| Insurance Europe | BE | transfers between processors in accordance with Article 46 (2) (c) GDPR. Comments on the level playing field of GDPR enforcement: Article 52(4) of the GDPR establishes that each Member State shall ensure that each supervisory authority is provided with the hum ↗ |
| Brave | US | ation of the Regulation throughout the Union, this must be urgently corrected. 2. MEMBER STATES FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENT ARTICLE 52(4), WHICH PREVENTS SUPERVISORY AUTHORITIES FROM ADEQUATELY COOPERATING TO ADDRESS LARGE TECH FIRMS. Brave has examin ↗ |
Source: public consultation submissions and position papers. n = 12 mentions; counted as a literal reference to the article number.