Filers who named this exact article number in their own text. It is their sentence, not our reading — and not a causal claim.
| Who | Country | What they wrote |
|---|---|---|
| ISPA-Internet Service Provdiers Austria | AT | Act could lead to misunderstandings in practice, which is why clarification in this regard would be desirable. • Right to object (Article 21) • Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) Where possible please provid ↗ |
| Confederation of Swedish Enterprise | SE | er data subject rights, such as the right to erasure or the right to withdraw consent. Consider revising and simplify language of Art. 21 GDPR. 7 (10) Right to protection of property and trade secrets The right to meaningful explanation and human intervention ↗ |
| FEBIS | DE | ccess to data (Article 15) • Rectification (Article 16) • Erasure (Article 17) • Data portability (Article 20) • Right to object (Article 21) • Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) It would be important to bet ↗ |
| ACCIS | BE | jection by the CRA, as this could potentially turn it into a body of appeal. 2. Disproportionate use of the right of to object in Article 21. Article 21 is most used by data subjects to object to the processing of their payment default data i.e., they have not ↗ |
| Asociación Española de Economía Digital (Adigital) | ES | ccess to data (Article 15) ● Rectification (Article 16) ● Erasure (Article 17) ● Data portability (Article 20) ● Right to object (Article 21) ● Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) Where possible, please provi ↗ |
| Doctrine | FR | fait droit à la demande d’opposition. La seconde question est relative aux cas d’ouverture à effacement/opposition. L’article 21 du RGPD conditionne le droit d'opposition à la justification d’une « raison tenant à [la] situation particulière » de la personne c ↗ |
| Selbstregulierung Informationswirtschaft e.V. (SRIW) | DE | in cases where a particular situation can be determined, Art. 21.1 GDPR still foresees another layer of evaluation. Such evaluation then may determine that processing may continue. In addition, in the specific case of Art. 21.6 GDPR, it would be appreciated if ↗ |
| Federation of the European Sporting Goods Industry (FESI) | BE | 4) -Access to data (Article 15) -Rectification (Article 16) Erasure (Article 17) -Data portability (Article 20) -Right to object (Article 21) -Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article ↗ |
| EDRi European Digital Rights | ES | lacks support from data controllers, as they neither adequately explain the right nor facilitate its exercise. • Right to object (Article 21) N/A • Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) Regrettably, data contro ↗ |
| BDI e.V. (Federation of German Industries) | DE | thers. Guidance on methodology, agreed formats, remain lacking across most sectors (insurance, banking, etc.). ▪ Right to object (Article 21) Relatively rarely exercised. However, out of the cases when it is exercised, it is most often to object for processing ↗ |
| Bitkom e.V. | DE | ) -Access to data (Article 15) -Rectification (Article 16) -Erasure (Article 17) -Data portability (Article 20) -Right to object (Article 21) -Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) Where possible please provide ↗ |
| German Insurance Association | DE | ity (Article 20) There is an extremely limited use of the right of data portability in the insurance industry. • Right to object (Article 21) There is a limited use of the right of object according to Art. 21 (1) GDPR in insurance companies. The right of Objec ↗ |
| Spolek pro ohranu osobních údajů | CZ | ntial for misuse, not least due to inadequate regulation in the legislation (as an example, out-of-court dispute settlement under Article 21 of the DSA). Experience with Data Protection Authorities As far as the Czech supervisory authority is concerned, we hav ↗ |
| Council of the Notariats of the EU | BE | re-litigation proceedings. • Rectification (Article 16) • Erasure (Article 17) • Data portability (Article 20) • Right to object (Article 21) • Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) Where possible please provid ↗ |
| ESOMAR | NL | y based on legitimate interest which gives the specific right of the recipients concerned to object to such data processing under Article 21 (2) GDPR, address data trading enables companies to reach out to new potential customers. However, as some DPAs in Germ ↗ |
| ACT | The App Association | BE | ccess to data (Article 15) • Rectification (Article 16) • Erasure (Article 17) • Data portability (Article 20) • Right to object (Article 21) • Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision-making (Article 22) b. Do you avail of / are you ↗ |
| EuroISPA (European Internet Services Providers Association) | BE | ccess to data (Article 15) • Rectification (Article 16) • Erasure (Article 17) • Data portability (Article 20) • Right to object (Article 21) • Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) Where possible please provid ↗ |
| French Association of Large Companies (AFEP) | FR | conditions under which the data collected in this way is re-used and stored by the authors of these requests. • Right to object (Article 21) NA • Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) NA b. Do you avail of/are ↗ |
| ANITEC-ASSINFORM | IT | ccess to data (Article 15) • Rectification (Article 16) • Erasure (Article 17) • Data portability (Article 20) • Right to object (Article 21) • Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) Where possible please ↗ |
| Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer | DE | rticle 15) Rectification (Article 16) Erasure (Article 17) Position page 4 Data portability (Article 20) Right to object (Article 21) Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) Where possible please provid ↗ |
| United Internet | DE | or inappropriate requests. • Rectification (Article 16) • Erasure (Article 17) • Data portability (Article 20) • Right to object (Article 21) • Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) Where possible please provid ↗ |
| ZKI e.V. | DE | 0681 20 SWIFT BIC: BYLADEM1001 Dr. Karl Molter 5/9 Letzteres gilt entsprechend für eine Musterwiderspruchsbelehrung im Sinne von Art. 21 Abs. 4 DSGVO. Mit klaren gesetzlichen Vorgaben zur Fristberechnung könnten Verantwortliche wesentlich entlastet werden, ↗ |
| Telefonica, S.A. | ES | ccess to data (Article 15) • Rectification (Article 16) • Erasure (Article 17) • Data portability (Article 20) • Right to object (Article 21) • Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) Where possible please provid ↗ |
| Homo Digitalis | EL | ccess to data (Article 15) • Rectification (Article 16) • Erasure (Article 17) • Data portability (Article 20) • Right to object (Article 21) • Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) Where possible please provid ↗ |
| Federation of Austrian Industries | AT | tic shortcoming in nature. These kinds of infringements shall than only be subject to fines with a low amount. • Right to object (Article 21) “Reasons arising from your particular situation”, seems too unclear. Also Art. 2I - in a certain interpretation - seem ↗ |
| AUSTRIAN FEDERAL ECONOMIC CHAMBER | AT | act that there are retention periods that prevent deletion is often not known. • Data portability (Article 20) • Right to object (Article 21) • Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) Where possible please provid ↗ |
| Finnish Energy | FI | ctification or erasure of personal data, or the restriction of processing, should be applied. Regarding the right to object under Article 21, concrete examples of what constitutes a 'reason relating to their particular situation' have been requested. This defi ↗ |
| Insurance Ireland | IE | nd Commission documents OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43– 48. • Erasure (Article 17) • Data portability (Article 20) • Right to object (Article 21) • Meaningful explanation and human intervention in automated decision making (Article 22) Where possible please provid ↗ |
| Anonos Inc. | US | always have the right under Article 21(3) to not receive direct marketing outreach as a result of such processing. b. Lawful Repurposing, Sharing and Combining [Article 6.4(e)] Pseudonymization is explicitly highlighted in GDPR Article 6(4)(e) as an “appropria ↗ |
| ITI - Information Technology Industry Council | US | on identification and protection of confidential information are included in Article 21 of the proposed Regulation. It is crucial that parties in proceedings are able to identify the documents which should be treated as confidential, and that the recipients of ↗ |
Source: public consultation submissions and position papers. n = 45 mentions; counted as a literal reference to the article number.